How Thomas Changed the Position
In Game 7 on Wednesday night in Vancouver, Tim Thomas made 37 saves and posted a 4-0 shutout to clinch the Stanley Cup and the Conn Smythe Trophy. With a million statistics and two shiny silver chalices to back up his awesome performance in this year’s playoffs, nothing was more inspiring to me than how he dominated Roberto Luongo in the mental toughness department.

As I discussed in my latest piece for NHL.com, Thomas’ cognitive skills are a thing to behold. What he encompasses doesn’t just include the visible traits of a strong work ethic, pure athleticism and an aggressive ”battle-fly” style, but also a keen and razor-sharp in-game intelligence. In my opinion, Thomas processes the game at a higher level than any other current NHL goaltender and is quickly changing the way goalies think.
By process, I mean Thomas’ ability to read situations - like the way a play develops around him, or the puck’s trajectory coming off a stick blade - and then react in a natural, effortless and calculated manner. He proved that, in Games 6 and 7 when his back was against the wall, he had the focus and mental clarity to execute with a tremendous amount of patience, but also with very explosive and sharp movements.
Outside of the actual game and underneath the surface of his visible technique, I think Thomas’ focus under pressure makes him the ultimate athlete and the toughest possible opponent to beat. He’s a perfect example of a goaltender that has the intense training of a martial artist, as his years of experience and mental discipline allow his body to do things that most goalies can’t.
It’s safe to say that in the Stanley Cup Finals, Thomas played on an entirely different level than everyone else out on the ice. He was in his own world, one where the only other thing that existed other than him was the puck.
—[ THOMAS' LONG-TERM IMPACT ]—
Thinking back to all of the goaltending duels I’ve ever witnessed in the Stanley Cup Finals, I can easily say that this was the most entertaining, dramatic and probably the most influential performance of them all. From start to finish, he just seemed to get better as time went on.
What Thomas proved to me is that goaltending, now more than ever before, goes well beyond the tangible aspects of fine positioning, angles and butterfly techniques. Instead of spending so much time honing and working on those things, coaches must pay closer attention to the mental approach of how each goaltender they work with makes saves.
As I sat back and absorbed all the post-game coverage on Versus and the NHL Network, I continued to ponder things from a wide perspective. What I came to learn was that Thomas, even long after he retires from the NHL, will single-handedly change the way millions of goaltenders embrace how they play the position.
Instead of molding their technique to what makes someone else successful, goaltenders will realize that they will be more successful by just being themselves and doing what feels most natural and comfortable. It’s a pretty big paradigm shift, one that I believe will ultimately make the collective world of goaltending more effective.
A mindset where the goaltender does not cling blindly to restrictive techniques, but rather relies on their instincts and ability to read plays to make certain saves, should start to quickly take over the way we approach, teach and play the position. In fact, many goalies could experience a seamless transition to this way of thinking since it doesn’t take away from the implementation of technique.
It’s more of a realization, an enlightenment, of sorts. Some goalies will realize it more than others. And many other goalies, especially the smaller-framed ones, have already come to realize it.
Of course goalie coaches around the world can still teach their techniques the same way, but hopefully now they will do so with the underlying premise that goalies must read a play first by engaging and activating their cognitive abilities. A goalie should never execute a technique unless the situation in front of them absolutely calls for it. So this is not a result of better technical training as much as seeing and thinking the game a slightly different way.
So again, what makes Thomas’ performance in the Stanley Cup Playoffs so influential, in my opinion, has nothing to do with the stats or accomplishments. It’s more about strong cognitive skills allowing him to read and react in a free-spirited, uninhibited manner. It’s about his ability to just go out there and play a pristine, unfettered style that is completely his own.
—[ THE TRANSCENDENT TRAITS OF THOMAS ]—
Ultimately, I’ve learned that Thomas encompasses four character traits that made him a transcendent goaltender in the Stanley Cup Finals.
1. AN EGO-LESS ATTITUDE: Similar to what you will find in the Elite Goalies philosophy, Thomas seems to play the position without any kind of an ego. He does not show any signs of caring about himself, his statistics, his style, how he looks, what people are saying about him or what happens if he gives up a bad goal.
There is no sense of entitlement and he understands, thanks in part to his storied past, how hard he must work in order to be successful. In fact, that work ethic is second nature. It’s just part of how he plays the game.
So whether you call it being humble or being unselfish, Thomas reflects the true essence of a great teammate. He enjoys the ride, he respects the process of doing what it takes to win a game, and he also appreciates and embraces the opportunity to play the game he loves.
2. PLAYING IN THE NOW: If you watch Thomas closely, you can see just how calculated, patient and sharp his movements are over the course of a game. There are many times where his aggressive nature does force him to scramble, but he still knows exactly when and how to scramble. He knows where the puck is going and can still stay in control of his pushes and slides and recoveries.
What makes Thomas’ ability to “play in the now” so intriguing to watch is that fact that he seems impervious to pressure. It’s as if that term does not exist in his dictionary because every moment is just as important as the last one. No game or moment, regardless of importance, is more influential than the last.
So whether it’s Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals or the first game of the season, Thomas is able to handle the atmosphere and read the situation in the same fashion. He’s always comfortable in his own skin and reacts to things as if he’s seen them a million times before. There’s an omniscient undertone to it all, as if he already knows what is going to happen next.
3. FAKING CONFIDENCE: When Thomas is unable to naturally radiate confidence due to the inherent pressure that comes from a quality scoring chance or good puck possession in his end, he doesn’t lock up, shut down or wither away. Instead, he has the keen situational awareness to find ways to fake confidence. During Game 7′s post-game press conferences, Thomas even discussed a few moments in Game 6 where he was worried about giving up a goal after losing sight of the puck.
His ability to discuss this openly is essentially an admission of fear within a hockey game. It was proof of his high confidence, his open-mindedness and a very impressive ability to think the game inside the game.
As any goaltender will agree, playing the position wields tremendous power. Saves can influence your defensemen, spark your forwards and ignite everyone on the team. With that in mind, a goaltender must work hard to instill confidence in their teammates by making saves in a manner that radiates positive and confident energy. Since Thomas gushes aggressiveness and confidence, he’s constantly making saves that injects energy in his teammates.
With that being said, Thomas displayed terrific mental toughness when he was able to keep his body language and demeanor “confident” despite honestly feeling nervous or falling behind plays. This faking of confidence was just one way he was able to stay in the zone and get into the heads of the Vancouver Canucks.
4. FREE-SPIRITED STYLE: What truly amazes me about Thomas’ performance in the Stanley Cup Finals was his ability to continue to play in a free-spirited manner despite the mounting pressure. In a situation where most goaltenders are more prone to hesitate, over-think, over-react or lock up, Thomas was a pure flow of positive energy. As the pressure increased, that flow was more and more powerful.
And just like I said in my piece on NHL.com, Thomas plays as if nothing else exists except him and the puck. His mind is free of all distractions. He allows nothing to break through the invisible wall that keeps his mind clear from anything that takes his focus off the puck.
—[ HOW THOMAS CHANGED THE POSITION ]—
In conclusion, I think Thomas’ play in the Stanley Cup Finals acts as a moment where the evolution of the butterfly goaltender experiences a real-time shift. Instead of goalies transforming into robots, coaches might take a page from Thomas’ book and instill more elements of vision and cognitive training into their coaching philosophies, mainly in order to improve a goalie’s instincts and reactions.
If this happens, goaltenders will learn to embrace what makes them unique. I can only hope that will lead them to not necessarily re-learn how to play the position in a more comfortable manner, but to let go of certain fears and ultimately think less and react more. Instead of trying to move and execute in such a standardized or “popular” manner, goalies will learn to read plays and do whatever they need to do to make the save.
Personally speaking, I know that I often find myself thinking more about how I look when making a save instead of just making it in the most effective, confident or effortless manner. I’m worried about looking as pretty as possible, or as close as possible to an NHL goaltender, that I don’t play to my strengths or move in a manner that is most effective for my unique body.
To be honest, I could go on and on about how Thomas has influenced the current and future state of the goaltending position. There is no end to the way in which he showed how important it is to have good cognitive skills. It’s an aspect of the position that is not discussed nearly enough. This cognitive element of stopping pucks, along with more advanced vision and mental training techniques, is the new frontier of the goaltending position. This is the step we must take, the path we must travel, in order to continue evolving and improving.
As I drift into a gratified dream state, I’ll always remember Tim Thomas’ performance in the Stanley Cup Finals as one of the most remarkable displays of mental toughness. He was the goaltender that was totally impervious to pressure, who played his own way and in a manner that made it seem like he was always comfortable and confident.
Rage against the machine. Destroy the parts of your psyche that make you play like a robot. Block only when necessary and don’t be afraid to flop or scramble or dive when that’s what it takes to stop the puck. Eliminate the train of thought that says the butterfly position has this “perfect” platform in which goaltenders are trying to reach.
For the true essence of the hybrid goalie, and we are all hybrids, is knowing when to block and when to react.
Play with an open mind, with a humble and likable personality, without an ego, without fear, without worry, and without clinging blindly to just playing the percentages.

very true article, Tim Thomas’ playoff toughness both mentally and physically helped the Bruins achieve the cup
Nice article. A few goalie coaches out there, Mitch Korn for one, have been focused on this for a long time.
But what you are forgetting is that Thomas did all of this with a team that has great defensive abilities both systematically and skill level of the defencemen. Game 7 for example there were very few quality scoring chances and there is not a goaltender at the NHL level that would have allowed a goal in that game. It’s easy to credit the goalie when they win. But i assure you if he played for Edmonton this past season they still end near the bottom of the league and perhaps still last place.
Careful what you start telling the goalie world especially kids who now think they don’t need technical training. They won’t have Chara defending them and keeping the Sedin’s to the perimeters and clearing rebounds!
I appreciate the comment, but taking team defense into accout is really
missing the point on what this article, and what Thomas, is all about.
Whether you have great defense or terrible defense, you make 37 saves or 13,
it’s the mental approach on when to execute technique in regards to the
situation.
Goalies of course need technical training. But BEFORE the technical
training, goalies must learn how to approach situations with a free mind,
not automatically or blindly clinging to butterfly slides or the VHS or the
paddle down movement. There’s a time and place for those movements, but way
too many young and even pro goalies are clinging to them without truly
reading the play and reacting freely.
I don’t think anything I portray in the article lends goalies (unless they
are really young and confused) to forget technique altogether. Thomas
clearly displays good technique with a number of saves he makes. Instead, I
paint a picture of how strong cognitive skills frees a goalie from blindly
clinging to technique. It makes goalies realize that decision-making and
working hard is more important than having the widest butterfly or the most
solid VHS stance.
A lot of good things in this comment. My response is that, to be honest, I think Giguere acts as a fork in the road. I believe that the robotic blocking style butterfly was actually a must-have for him to be successful because he clearly lacked the athleticism and footwork needed to play a more free-range style.
The problem was that waaayyy too many coaches and goalies looked at his success as an earmark or advancement of the position, when in fact it was simply one goalie embracing the style that made him most succesful.
This is where Thomas has flipped the bill. His style, which is essentially style-less, works best for him and is rooted in his amazing ability to read and react with a clear mind and free of any robotic limitations.
At the end of the day, this is what makes me feel he did to revolutionize the position: he proved every single goalie has their own style and it must be embraced in order for the goalie to think freely. As soon as you or I try to make certain saves in a way that reflects another goalie, the chance is there for that save selection to be incorrect for our own body’s biometrics.
Two goalies that are 6-2 and 200 pounds might have similar frames, but by no means should they play the same way.
I think Luongo was over-coached since arriving in Vancouver. Too much technical training. He needs to learn this summer how to think for himself and know when to abandon technique. He needs to re-activate his mind in the crease and take back a bit of the aggressiveness he had in Florida.
Like you said, a marriage of the two is the last step many goalies in the nhl and ahl need to make in order to truly start the journey to become an elite and individualistic goalie.
A goalie like Tim Thomas.
I love when people say a well technically trained goalie lacks athleticism. You have just proven you know very little about athletics yourself. Goalies such as Hasak, Joseph, and Thomas are not faster or better athletically. Due to their lack of training and technique they rely on flopping around. They appear to the untrained eye (or yours) to be quicker, but they are certainly not.
I guess Toronto should get rid of Reimer The Robot, since the new age of goaltending is not being “robotic.” He proves you wrong as well!
Just a heads up, Disqus tracks IP’s. There’s really no reason to come on here and hide behind a different screenname and make derrogatory remarks. This comment is off-base and confusing. Nowhere at all do I ever mention James Reimer in this article or in my comments, so not sure why you call him a robot.
His style, just like Thomas’, just like Luongo’s, work best for them. That’s why they are so successful, so effective. Same with Giguere. The robotic butterfly worked best for him, that’s what made him successful.
That has nothing to do with what I’m discussing or portraying in Thomas. It’s about the mindset, not the tangible display of how they move. I’m not sure why you mention Hasek and Joseph, either?
Giguere is very well trained, but have you even seen him play the last two years? He’s getting slower every month. Too many injuries, he rarely looks healthy. He lacks athleticism compared to many other goalies in the NHL. It’s very simple to understand.
First off, there is more than one person living in this house that loves goaltending! In fact there is four of us. Secondly, your article talks about Thomas changing goaltending because of his recent play. Reimer plays a very technical and quiet blocking game which is the complete opposite of Thomas and he did just as well as Timmy. All goalies can read the play at the NHL level as good as Thomas. All goalies can battle as good as Thomas. What is fooling you is Thomas’ unorthodox save techniques that appear to make him more athletic. A Gigeure or Reimer will appear to be slower or not as athletic/battler, because they don’t waste movements.
I will agree with you that his mental game is very good. It’s refreshing to see a pro athlete who is having fun out there, smiling and laughing. It’s a game and there is no reason athletes can’t perform at the highest level without a snarl on their face.
Again you are totally missing the point. I am not fooled by anything thomas does. I’ve spoken with numerous NHL goalie coaches during the finals, all of which agree that Thomas’ COGNITIVE SKILLS are what make him so special.
Stop looking at this from a “style” perspective. It has nothing to do with style! It doesn’t fool me. It’s not hard to decipher. I’ve scouted him in real life at Avalanche games from the press box and have done my homework. To say I’m fooled by how he moves is ridiculous and flat out silly!!
And it’s not his recent PLAY at all that I am saying changed the position. It’s his ego-less approach and cognitive skills!!! Did you even read the article? He changes the way some goalies and coaches view what makes a successful goalie. It has NOTHING to do about him scrambling or diving around. That’s the result of his active and aggressive style. And again, that’s not the subject here at all!
It is also ridiculous to say Reimer did just as well as Thomas. Reimer was a rookie that experienced good success in around 35 NHL games. But he didn’t make it to the playoffs and he didn’t even come close to posting a .938 save percentage. This was the Stanley Cup Finals man!!!! Relating the two is laughable. Thomas’ season shattered records and went from Game 2 in Europe to Game 7 of the Cup Finals. I watched him all season long and I watched every game Reimer played except for one or two and wrote numerous reports on Reimer and talked to his agent. Great kid but has a lot of work to do.
Your last paragraph proves my whole point!! Anyone CAN play that way, but very few people have the mindset and Kinesthetic Sense to play with a free mind in the most pressure-filled situations like Thomas did in the Finals!
You should read the piece I wrote for NHL.com and learn about Thomas some more. Pay close attention to the quotes from Mike Valley.
Pretty sure I’m not confused by anything Thomas is doing. But I appreciate the comments.
Save techniques are the result of cognitive skills are they not? How can you possibly say that Thomas has better cognitive skill than Reimer or anyone else? If Reimer played for Boston and Thomas played for Toronto what do you think happens?
Thomas had a .938 save percentage in Boston. Did the team have anything to do with that? If he played for Edmonton this past season would we be talking about how good his cognitive skills are? Think about that for a moment. New Jersey only scored 2.08 goals per game and allowed only 2.52. Boston scored 2.98 per game and allowed 2.30. I heard all year from experts that the Devils defense was terrible. So does Thomas make the Devils a champion. Not even close!
I think you are doing what most people do and giving the goalie far to much credit and his team not nearly enough.
Someone on Twitter said this was thegoalieguru dude. Clearly confirmed. I respect your opinions, but you need to move on. Hiding behind a bunch of different names is not the way to discuss this topic. It is almost worse than trolling.
We’ll gladly move on!Peace.
Your comments about Luongo in the 3rd-to-last paragraph are in complete contradiction to an article written by Justin Goldman back in September… oh wait, that’s you too. You noted in that article that Luongo would benefit from the coaching of Melanson (quote: “With Melanson by his side on a more consistent basis…”) and that the technical training would improve his game! Which is it Justin?
http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/24/the-goalie-guild-explains-why-deeper-is-better-for-roberto-luongo/
September was ages ago. Everything written in that article was accurate. And I don’t see anything in the third-to-last paragraph that has anything to do with Roberto Luongo. I don’t mention him at all because the article has nothing to do with him.
Some of the comments in here are really strange. This article was about Tim Thomas and his influence on the way people think about the position. Nowhere does it compare how he plays to how Luongo plays. They are completely different animals.
I don’t necessarily think that Thomas will change anything in regards to goaltending. Yeah he’s undersized and yeah he doesn’t play the prototypical ‘style’ if you will of what a modern goalie is supposed to be.
However, he does have the fundamentals of a modern game with a prioritization of the ‘down’ game while he lacks elite NHL level skills for what typically would be considered an NHL ‘prospect’ these days.
How he does challenge the status quo is the fact that in this Cup finals you say a complete contrast of ideologies in goal. One being the, as I call it, cookie cutter goalie who plays the textbook style and system of play vs. a guy who is a competitor, a battler a guy who gets off on proving his doubters and detractors wrong. The indomitable spirit willing to do whatever it takes to get the job done.
Far too often coaches and scouts look at a goalie and they see size, they see technique as the differentiating factors at the top of the talent funnel where the skills tend to blur. Thomas is none of these. But his athleticism and battle level make up for his deficiencies in terms of technical skills, and size. The hope is that coaches and scouts going forward will look more into the psyche of the goaltender more so than just technical abilities and the geometry of the situation. Never before has this been more proven than in this Cup finals where the differentiation between the two came down to battle level and athleticism. Had Luongo exemplified more of both(if he has the ability to is in question) then the outcome easily could have been different.
I’ve said amongst the goalie circles for years that technical abilities do not make the goalie. They are a significant part but a goalie MUST be able to ‘freelance’ outside the technical constraints of their system of play to be able to be successful because the game changes in an instant and there isn’t a technical answer to every challenge and problem that arises. There must be the ability to instinctively react to the breakdowns and changes as they occur in a game.
This dovetails to your ‘cognitive abilities’. Situational awareness, coupled with athleticism and a very high battle level will result in a goalie who when you need him will be there and will battle to the bitter end. Hasek had this, as he was one of the best goalies at being ahead of the play as it developed. Thomas shows this as well, and you can add guys like Pekke Rinne in there too.
With the game going, as Mike Valley said in one of your other posts, more ‘east-west’ you need goalies who can read, anticipate and react to the dynamic nature of the game. The cookie cutter, stop-drop-block goalies simply do not have a place in the future of the higher levels of hockey.
Great comment and thanks for reading. I personally do not think Thomas lacks elite skills. He has amazing reactions, good footwork and also does a great job of absorbing pucks. He does struggle handling the puck though.
I think this is what makes Thomas so unique and revolutionary. He can do all of the same things other NHL goalies can do, he just has much better cognitive skills and knows that the more robotic movements are not the best way for his body to stop the puck in the most effective manner.
Goaltending is 90% mental. Failure to think the game at a higher level will force a goalie to rely on technique in situations that do not call for it. This leads the goalie to appear robotic or unsure of how to move into pucks.
In essence, their minds are disengaged.
In the Cup Finals, Thomas’ mind was attuned to the puck’s movement in the most pressure-filled moments. But Luongo’s shut down and locked him up. He was unable to set his mind free from muscle-memory technique and play in the now.
And that was the difference in Games 6 and 7.
That was a great article! Well thought out. I will be passing it on, and hopefully it will get to our goaltenders and coaches to reflect on.
Every year the Cup-winning goalie proves something about who or what kind of
talent can win. But Thomas THINKS differently from any other goalie I’ve
watched, and you can see just how dominant he was in this year’s playoffs.
He had some bad games, gave up some bad games, but as each series went
along, he got sharper and sharper. At his age, he proves that experience
and an ego-less approach to playing the game trumps any other goalie that
might be bigger and more technically sound. Thomas does not restrict himself
to any one particular style. He is an amorphic combination of all styles,
all forms. He is form-less and can morph or shape himself into anything he
needs to be. This all comes from a powerful and attentive mind that
I personally don’t think can be matched by any other NHL goalie.
Great read Justin! I am curious how you view a goaltender like CuJo, who was also very much a read and react keeper, as opposed to employing a technically sound butterfly style? I always enjoyed watching him battle, and make unbelievable saves, much like Thomas has shown us.
Rob
Yes, I think CuJo was another one of the goalies that didn’t blindly move
without knowing exactly how he wanted to make the save. He was definitely
what I consider a free spirit. Still, he made some good technical
adjustments when he got to Phoenix and it extended his career for a few more
years. The technique is important, but the key is to not let it turn off
your brain’s ability to process plays.